The idea that a central bank might be constrained by rules is problematic. It merely moves the central bank’s choices to the more abstract level of selecting and interpreting rules.
Economists bade farewell to Leland Yeager, one of the greatest monetary thinkers of the 20th century, earlier this week.
Dividing the world into “centralized” and “decentralized” obscures important features of the bitcoin protocol. A more sophisticated lexicon would leave scope for “distributed” processes.
Following the financial crisis and Great Recession, many bloggers (and some economists) have expressed disappointment with the state of macroeconomics. Randall Wright offers a more optimistic perspective.
Venezuela recently launched its own cryptocurrency. If recent history is any indicator, investors should steer clear.
If the language of commerce is quid pro quo, money is its grammar.
If macroeconomists do not want to take responsibility for crises, then they should refrain from endorsing unstable monetary institutions.
A trade war would not only make the United States less productive. It would also make monetary policy more difficult.
In a recent Econometrica article, Matthias Doepke and Martin Schneider model money as a standardized unit of account.